Run - 1.3 hours - 12/31/2007
December 31st, 2007Workout:
- Type: Run
- Date: 12/31/2007
- Time: 07:00:00
- Total Time: 1:18:45.00
- Distance: 9 miles
- Average Pace: 8:44.78/mile
Workout:
Workout:
Workout:
Workout:
Workout:
Workout:
Ahhhh…..a nice run to break up the hectic day of putting together scooters and installing iTunes software for the kids’ new iPods! Next it’s off to the in-laws for more Christmas fun!
Merry Christmas everyone!
Workout:
16 miles at hilly Whitnall Park; I even got to wear my shorts in mid-December! Heat wave!
Workout:
I know there has been a lot of discussion on these boards the past few weeks about running cadence, or stride counts. At the same time, over the past 2-3 months I have been paying close attention to my own cadence and have been working on improving it. So obviously I have had my running watch working double-duty during this time.
One interesting thing I have noticed is that the faster I go, the higher my cadence is. For example, at a 9:00 pace, I am usually around 168 strides per minute. At an 8:00 pace, the number is 172: at 7:00, it goes up to 178; and at a 6:00/5K race pace, my strides are 182 per minute. So you can see the pattern.
Much of what I have been reading lately has said two things: 1) your cadence should be the same at every pace, and 2) your optimal number should be somewhere between 170 and 180 steps per minute.
So do I have a problem here, and if so, what is it? The main purpose of my running is to race faster, and my “race cadence” is excellent. Am I risking an injury at the slower speeds because my turnover rate is not quick enough? Or are all of the running coaches who preach this stuff overlooking the obvious: that the faster you go, the greater your cadence will be.
Workout:
2 miles @ 8:34 pace; 4 miles @ 6:57 pace; 2 miles @ 8:20 pace
Workout: